Divorce Theories and Grounds for Divorce and Legal Provisions

Divorce Theories and Grounds for Divorce and Legal Provisions

    Introduction

  •   Pursuant to the Hindu Code Bill, the Parliament of India enacted the Hindu Marriage Act in the year 1955, with the aim of amending and consolidating the laws pertaining to matrimonial relationships among Hindus, encompassing not only the legal aspects of marriage (including its validity and circumstances leading to its nullity) but also regulating sundry facets of personal life within the Hindu community and their applicability to the broader Indian social milieu, Whereas the Hindu Marriage Act serves to provide a framework for Hindus to enter into matrimonial bonds in an organized manner, affording significance to the institution of marriage, delineating rights of cohabitation for both parties, and ensuring the well-being of their progeny by mitigating the adverse impacts stemming from parental discord. While marriage is traditionally regarded as a sacred union, the Hindu Marriage Act acknowledges the possibility of divorce, permitting either spouse to seek dissolution of the marriage on grounds of irreconcilable differences or the inability to sustain the marital relationship.
  •   Typically, a petition for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act may only be filed after one year of marriage registration. Nevertheless, in exceptional circumstances such as significant suffering experienced by the petitioner or demonstrable mental incapacity of the respondent, the court may entertain a petition for divorce before the lapse of one year.
  • Theories of Divorce:

  •   I. Guilt/Fault Theory of Divorce:This theory holds that divorce is only justified if one spouse has committed a matrimonial offense, leaving the other innocent party to seek relief. It requires an identification of an innocent and guilty party within the marriage.
  •   II. Mutual Consent Theory of Divorce:Under this theory, recognized in Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, marriage is viewed as a voluntary social contract between two individuals. Therefore, if both parties agree, they should have the right to dissolve the marriage.
  •   III. Irretrievable Breakdown Theory of Divorce:This theory allows either party to file for divorce without assigning specific fault. It focuses on the irreparable breakdown of the marriage, where reconciliation is deemed impossible.
  •   Judicial Separation:Judicial separation provides couples with a legal mechanism to live separately and reflect on their troubled marriage. It offers an opportunity for introspection and contemplation on the future of the relationship, acting as a last resort before divorce.
  • Grounds for Divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act:

  •   I. Adultery [Section 13(1)(i)]: Involves voluntary sexual intercourse with someone other than one's spouse.
  •   II. Cruelty [Section 13(1)(i-a)]: Occurs when a spouse inflicts mental or physical pain on their partner.
  •   III. Desertion [Section 13(1)(i-b)]: Leaving the spouse without communication for at least two years.
  •   IV. Conversion/Apostasy [Section 13(1)(ii)]: One spouse converting to another religion.
  •   V. Unsound mind [Section 13(1)(iii)]: If one spouse suffers from a mental illness making cohabitation difficult.
  •   VI. Leprosy [Section 13(1)(iv)]: If one spouse suffers from an incurable disease like leprosy.
  •   VII. Venereal Disease [Section 13(1)(v)]: If one spouse has an incurable and communicable disease unknown to the other at the time of marriage.
  •  VIII. Renounced the World [Section 13(1)(vi)]: If one spouse renounces worldly life to lead a holy life.
  •  IX. Civil death/Presumed death [Section 13(1)(vii)]: If a spouse is absent for seven years and presumed dead.
  •  Furthermore, a spouse, particularly the wife, retains the right to pursue divorce under the following circumstances:
  •  I. In instances where the marriage predates the enactment of the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, and it is revealed that the husband was already married with another surviving spouse at the time of the marriage ceremony.
  •   II. If subsequent to the marriage, the husband is found culpable of committing acts of rape, sodomy, or bestiality.
  •  III. Failure to resume cohabitation within a year following an order for maintenance issued under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code or alternatively, under the provisions of the Hindu Adoptions & Maintenance Act of 1956.
  •  IV. If the wife was below the legal age of marriage at the time of solemnization and repudiates the marriage prior to reaching the age of 18 years.
  •  These legal grounds provide a framework for seeking divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, covering various circumstances and considerations within the realm of marriage dissolution.
  • Legal Provision:

    I. Adultery:
  •  Adultery constitutes grounds for divorce across all personal laws in India, recognized as a significant breach of matrimonial obligations detrimental to marital harmony.
  •   Definition:
  •  Adultery denotes voluntary sexual intercourse between a married individual and a person of the opposite sex. It remains undefined within matrimonial statutes.
  •   Legislative Provisions:
  •  Under the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) of 1955, as stipulated in sections 13(1)(i) and 10(1), either spouse may petition for dissolution of marriage or judicial separation, respectively, on the basis of the other party engaging in voluntary sexual intercourse with someone other than their spouse post-marriage. A similar provision exists within the Special Marriage Act of 1954.
  •   Legal Precedent:
  •  In the case of Mallika v. Rajendran, the court granted a divorce decree to the wife on the grounds of the husband's proven adultery and desertion.
  •   Essential Criteria for Adultery:
  •  Post-Marriage Occurrence: Adultery must occur after the solemnization of marriage for it to constitute legal grounds for divorce.
  •   Consensual Act:
  •  The sexual act must be consensual; coercion or fraud nullifies the accusation of adultery.
  •   Involvement of Third Party:
  •  The respondent must engage in sexual activity with a person other than their spouse.
  •   Co-Respondent:
  •  TIn legal proceedings, a co-respondent may be implicated in cases of adultery, irrespective of gender.
  •   Evidence and Burden of Proof:
  •  The burden of proving adultery lies with the petitioner, requiring either direct or circumstantial evidence.
  •   II. Desertion:
  •  Desertion, defined as the unilateral abandonment of marital obligations, is recognized as grounds for divorce across various personal laws in India.
  •   Elements of Desertion:
  •  Key elements include the fact of separation, intention to desert, absence of petitioner's consent, lack of reasonable cause, and a statutory period of two years.
  •   III. Cruelty:
  •  Cruelty, encompassing physical or mental harm inflicted upon a spouse, constitutes grounds for divorce and judicial separation.
  •   Varied Forms of Cruelty:
  •  Cruelty may manifest in physical violence, mental abuse, denial of essential care, or verbal insults.
  •   IV. Insanity:
  •  Mental incapacity, impairing one's ability to fulfill marital obligations, may warrant annulment of marriage under certain personal laws.
  •   V. Leprosy:
  •  Leprosy, if incurable and virulent, serves as grounds for divorce and judicial separation.
  •   VI. Venereal Disease:
  •  A communicable venereal disease constitutes grounds for divorce and judicial separation, irrespective of its curability or time of contraction.
  •   VII. Conversion:
  •  Conversion to another religion by one spouse provides grounds for matrimonial relief under specific personal laws, where the non-converted spouse may seek divorce or separation.